PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps - The Sure Way To Pass Exam [Q21-Q38]

Share

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps - The Sure Way To Pass Exam

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Questions (Updated 2026) 100% Real Question Answers


PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.
Topic 2
  • Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.
Topic 3
  • Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.
Topic 4
  • Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO
  • IEC 27005: Centered around ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.

 

NEW QUESTION # 21
Does information security reduce the impact of risks?

  • A. Yes, information security reduces risks and their impact by protecting the organization against threats and vulnerabilities
  • B. Yes, information security reduces the impact of risks by eliminating the likelihood of exploitation of vulnerabilities by threats
  • C. No, information security does not have an impact on risks as information security and risk management are separate processes

Answer: A

Explanation:
Information security aims to protect information assets against threats and vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction. By implementing effective security measures (such as access controls, encryption, and monitoring), an organization reduces the likelihood of vulnerabilities being exploited and mitigates the potential impact of risks. According to ISO/IEC 27005, risk management in information security includes identifying, assessing, and applying controls to reduce both the likelihood and impact of potential risks. Thus, option A is correct because it acknowledges the role of information security in reducing the impact of risks. Option B is incorrect because information security is a key component of risk management, and option C is incorrect because information security does not eliminate risks entirely; it mitigates their impact.


NEW QUESTION # 22
Scenario 4: In 2017, seeing that millions of people turned to online shopping, Ed and James Cordon founded the online marketplace for footwear called Poshoe. In the past, purchasing pre-owned designer shoes online was not a pleasant experience because of unattractive pictures and an inability to ascertain the products' authenticity. However, after Poshoe's establishment, each product was well advertised and certified as authentic before being offered to clients. This increased the customers' confidence and trust in Poshoe's products and services. Poshoe has approximately four million users and its mission is to dominate the second-hand sneaker market and become a multi-billion dollar company.
Due to the significant increase of daily online buyers, Poshoe's top management decided to adopt a big data analytics tool that could help the company effectively handle, store, and analyze dat a. Before initiating the implementation process, they decided to conduct a risk assessment. Initially, the company identified its assets, threats, and vulnerabilities associated with its information systems. In terms of assets, the company identified the information that was vital to the achievement of the organization's mission and objectives. During this phase, the company also detected a rootkit in their software, through which an attacker could remotely access Poshoe's systems and acquire sensitive data.
The company discovered that the rootkit had been installed by an attacker who had gained administrator access. As a result, the attacker was able to obtain the customers' personal data after they purchased a product from Poshoe. Luckily, the company was able to execute some scans from the target device and gain greater visibility into their software's settings in order to identify the vulnerability of the system.
The company initially used the qualitative risk analysis technique to assess the consequences and the likelihood and to determine the level of risk. The company defined the likelihood of risk as "a few times in two years with the probability of 1 to 3 times per year." Later, it was decided that they would use a quantitative risk analysis methodology since it would provide additional information on this major risk. Lastly, the top management decided to treat the risk immediately as it could expose the company to other issues. In addition, it was communicated to their employees that they should update, secure, and back up Poshoe's software in order to protect customers' personal information and prevent unauthorized access from attackers.
According to scenario 4, the top management of Poshoe decided to treat the risk immediately after conducting the risk analysis. Is this in compliance with risk management best practices?

  • A. Yes. risk treatment options should be implemented immediately after analyzing the risk, as the risk could expose the company to other security threats
  • B. No, risk evaluation should be performed before making any decision regarding risk treatment
  • C. No, the risk should be communicated to all the interested parties before making any decision regarding risk treatment

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, after conducting risk analysis, the next step in the risk management process should be risk evaluation. Risk evaluation involves comparing the estimated level of risk against risk criteria established by the organization to determine the significance of the risk and decide whether it is acceptable or needs treatment. Only after evaluating the risk should an organization decide on the appropriate risk treatment options. Therefore, in the scenario, deciding to treat the risk immediately after conducting the risk analysis, without first performing a risk evaluation, is not in compliance with risk management best practices. Option A is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.5, "Risk Evaluation," which describes the process of evaluating risks after analysis to determine if they require treatment.


NEW QUESTION # 23
An organization decided to use nonnumerical categories, i.e., low, medium, and high for describing consequence and probability. Which risk analysis methodology is the organization using?

  • A. Qualitative
  • B. Quantitative
  • C. Semi-quantitative

Answer: A

Explanation:
A qualitative risk analysis method uses nonnumerical categories such as low, medium, and high to describe the consequences and probability of risks. This method involves subjective judgment based on expertise, experience, and intuition rather than mathematical calculations. Qualitative methods are often used when it is challenging to obtain accurate numerical data, and they provide a general understanding of risks to prioritize them for further action. Option C is correct because the use of nonnumerical categories aligns with the qualitative risk analysis methodology. Option A (Quantitative) is incorrect as it involves numerical values and statistical methods, while Option B (Semi-quantitative) is a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, usually involving ranges of numerical values.


NEW QUESTION # 24
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Travivve decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. Is this acceptable?

  • A. No, the risk management process must be applied in all organizational levels
  • B. Yes, the risk management process must be applied to only those departments that handle customers' personal information in an organization
  • C. Yes, the risk management process may be applied to only a subset of departments in an organization

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 provides guidance on risk management for information security, and it allows flexibility in applying the risk management process to different parts of an organization. The decision to initially apply the risk management process only to the Sales Management Department is acceptable under ISO/IEC 27005, as the standard supports the selective application of risk management activities based on the specific needs and priorities of the organization. This is in line with risk management best practices, where organizations may focus on critical areas first (such as high-risk departments or those that handle sensitive information) and later expand the process as needed. Therefore, applying the risk management process to a subset of departments is appropriate, making option B the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 7, "Context Establishment," which allows defining the scope and boundaries of risk management as relevant to the organization's needs.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 4.3, "Determining the scope of the information security management system," which also permits defining a scope based on priorities and relevance.


NEW QUESTION # 25
According to ISO/IEC 27005, what is the output of the documentation of risk management processes?

  • A. Documented information that is necessary for the effectiveness of the information security risk assessment or risk treatment processes
  • B. Documented information about the information security risk assessment and treatment results
  • C. Knowledge on the information security risk assessment and treatment processes in accordance with clauses 7 and 8 of the standard

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the output of the documentation of risk management processes should include detailed information about the results of the risk assessment and the chosen risk treatment options. This ensures transparency and provides a clear record of the decision-making process related to information security risk management. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.


NEW QUESTION # 26
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Which risk assessment methodology does Biotide use?

  • A. OCTAVE-S
  • B. MEHARI
  • C. OCTAVE Allegro

Answer: C

Explanation:
Biotide uses the OCTAVE Allegro methodology for risk assessment. This is determined based on the description of the activities mentioned in the scenario. OCTAVE Allegro is a streamlined approach specifically designed to help organizations perform risk assessments that are efficient and effective, particularly when handling information assets. The methodology focuses on a thorough examination of information assets, the threats they face, and the impact of those threats.
Activity Area 1: OCTAVE Allegro defines the criteria for evaluating the impact of risks, which is consistent with determining the risk effects' evaluation criteria in the scenario.
Activity Area 2: In OCTAVE Allegro, a critical step is creating profiles for information assets, identifying their owners, and determining security requirements. This aligns with the activity in which Biotide identifies critical assets, their owners, and their security needs.
Activity Area 3: Identifying areas of concern that initiate risk identification and analyzing threat scenarios is central to OCTAVE Allegro. This is reflected in the activity of identifying areas of concern and determining the likelihood of threats.
Activity Area 4: Evaluating the risks, reviewing criteria, and determining risk levels corresponds to the latter stages of OCTAVE Allegro, where risks are prioritized based on the likelihood and impact, and risk management strategies are formulated accordingly.
The steps outlined align with the OCTAVE Allegro approach, which focuses on understanding and addressing information security risks comprehensively and in line with organizational objectives. Hence, option A, OCTAVE Allegro, is the correct answer.
ISO/IEC 27005:2018 emphasizes the importance of using structured methodologies for information security risk management, like OCTAVE Allegro, to ensure that risks are consistently identified, assessed, and managed in accordance with organizational risk tolerance and objectives.


NEW QUESTION # 27
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option was used for the first risk scenario?

  • A. Risk avoidance
  • B. Risk modification
  • C. Risk sharing

Answer: B

Explanation:
Risk modification involves implementing measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. In the first risk scenario, Productscape decided to use an automated "build and deploy" process to reduce the likelihood of an attacker exploiting a security misconfiguration vulnerability. This action aims to lower the risk to an acceptable level, which is characteristic of risk modification. Option B (Risk avoidance) would involve eliminating the risk by avoiding the activity altogether, which is not what was done. Option C (Risk sharing) involves transferring some or all of the risk to a third party, which is not applicable in this scenario.


NEW QUESTION # 28
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Did the risk management team establish all the criteria required to perform the information security risk assessment? Refer to scenario 2.

  • A. No, the risk management team should also establish the criteria for determining the level of risk
  • B. No, the risk management team should also establish the criteria for treating the identified risks
  • C. Yes. the risk management team established all the criteria that are necessary to perform an information security risk assessment

Answer: A

Explanation:
While Travivve's risk management team established criteria for consequence and likelihood, ISO/IEC 27005 requires that additional criteria should be defined to complete a risk assessment. Specifically, the team should also establish criteria for determining the level of risk, which involves combining the likelihood and consequence to evaluate risk magnitude. This step is crucial for prioritizing risks and determining which risks require treatment. The absence of criteria for determining the level of risk means that the team did not fully meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 27005 for performing an information security risk assessment. Therefore, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.4, "Risk Assessment," which outlines the need to establish criteria for risk acceptance, which includes determining the level of risk.


NEW QUESTION # 29
Scenario 1
The risk assessment process was led by Henry, Bontton's risk manager. The first step that Henry took was identifying the company's assets. Afterward, Henry created various potential incident scenarios. One of the main concerns regarding the use of the application was the possibility of being targeted by cyber attackers, as a great number of organizations were experiencing cyberattacks during that time. After analyzing the identified risks, Henry evaluated them and concluded that new controls must be implemented if the company wants to use the application. Among others, he stated that training should be provided to personnel regarding the use of the application and that awareness sessions should be conducted regarding the importance of protecting customers' personal data.
Lastly, Henry communicated the risk assessment results to the top management. They decided that the application will be used only after treating the identified risks.
Based on scenario 1, Bontton used ISO/IEC 27005 to ensure effective implementation of all ISO/IEC 27001 requirements. Is this appropriate?

  • A. Yes, ISO/IEC 27005 provides direct guidance on the implementation of the requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001
  • B. Yes, ISO/IEC 27005 provides a number of methodologies that can be used under the risk management framework for implementing all requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001
  • C. No, ISO/IEC 27005 does not contain direct guidance on the implementation of all requirements given in ISO/IEC 27001

Answer: C

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 is an international standard specifically focused on providing guidelines for information security risk management within the context of an organization's overall Information Security Management System (ISMS). It does not provide direct guidance on implementing the specific requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, which is a standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an ISMS. Instead, ISO/IEC 27005 provides a framework for managing risks that could affect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. Therefore, while ISO/IEC 27005 supports the risk management process that is crucial for compliance with ISO/IEC 27001, it does not contain specific guidelines or methodologies for implementing all the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. This makes option C the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, "Information Security Risk Management," which emphasizes risk management guidance rather than direct implementation of ISO/IEC 27001 requirements.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 6.1.2, "Information Security Risk Assessment," where risk assessment and treatment options are outlined but not in a prescriptive manner found in ISO/IEC 27005.


NEW QUESTION # 30
According to ISO/IEC 27000, what is the definition of information security?

  • A. Protection of privacy during the processing of personally identifiable information
  • B. Preservation of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information
  • C. Preservation of authenticity, accountability, and reliability in the cyberspace

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27000, information security is defined as the "preservation of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information." This definition highlights the three core principles of information security:
Confidentiality ensures that information is not disclosed to unauthorized individuals or systems.
Integrity ensures the accuracy and completeness of information and its processing methods.
Availability ensures that authorized users have access to information and associated assets when required.
This definition encompasses the protection of information in all forms and aligns with ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on managing information security risks. Therefore, option A is the correct answer. Options B and C are incorrect as they refer to more specific aspects or other areas of information management.


NEW QUESTION # 31
Scenario 4: In 2017, seeing that millions of people turned to online shopping, Ed and James Cordon founded the online marketplace for footwear called Poshoe. In the past, purchasing pre-owned designer shoes online was not a pleasant experience because of unattractive pictures and an inability to ascertain the products' authenticity. However, after Poshoe's establishment, each product was well advertised and certified as authentic before being offered to clients. This increased the customers' confidence and trust in Poshoe's products and services. Poshoe has approximately four million users and its mission is to dominate the second-hand sneaker market and become a multi-billion dollar company.
Due to the significant increase of daily online buyers, Poshoe's top management decided to adopt a big data analytics tool that could help the company effectively handle, store, and analyze dat a. Before initiating the implementation process, they decided to conduct a risk assessment. Initially, the company identified its assets, threats, and vulnerabilities associated with its information systems. In terms of assets, the company identified the information that was vital to the achievement of the organization's mission and objectives. During this phase, the company also detected a rootkit in their software, through which an attacker could remotely access Poshoe's systems and acquire sensitive data.
The company discovered that the rootkit had been installed by an attacker who had gained administrator access. As a result, the attacker was able to obtain the customers' personal data after they purchased a product from Poshoe. Luckily, the company was able to execute some scans from the target device and gain greater visibility into their software's settings in order to identify the vulnerability of the system.
The company initially used the qualitative risk analysis technique to assess the consequences and the likelihood and to determine the level of risk. The company defined the likelihood of risk as "a few times in two years with the probability of 1 to 3 times per year." Later, it was decided that they would use a quantitative risk analysis methodology since it would provide additional information on this major risk. Lastly, the top management decided to treat the risk immediately as it could expose the company to other issues. In addition, it was communicated to their employees that they should update, secure, and back up Poshoe's software in order to protect customers' personal information and prevent unauthorized access from attackers.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Poshoe detected a rootkit installed in their software. In which category of threats does this threat belong?

  • A. Human actions
  • B. Technical failures
  • C. Organizational threats

Answer: A

Explanation:
A rootkit installed in software due to an attacker gaining administrator access is considered a threat resulting from human actions. In this scenario, the attacker deliberately exploited a vulnerability to install the rootkit and gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. ISO/IEC 27005 categorizes threats into three main types: technical failures, human actions, and environmental events. Since this threat is a result of intentional malicious activity by an individual (human), it falls under the category of human actions. Option A (Technical failures) would refer to failures in hardware or software that are not caused by deliberate actions, while Option C (Organizational threats) would relate to internal organizational issues, neither of which apply to this case.


NEW QUESTION # 32
Which activity below is NOT included in the information security risk assessment process?

  • A. Selecting information security risk treatment options
  • B. Determining the risk identification approach
  • C. Prioritizing risks for risk treatment

Answer: A

Explanation:
The information security risk assessment process, as outlined in ISO/IEC 27005, typically includes identifying risks, assessing their potential impact, and prioritizing them. However, selecting risk treatment options is not part of the risk assessment process itself; it is part of the subsequent risk treatment phase. Therefore, option C is the correct answer as it is not included in the risk assessment process.


NEW QUESTION # 33
Based on the EBIOS RM method, which of the following is one of the four attack sequence phases?

  • A. Attacking
  • B. Treating
  • C. Exploiting

Answer: C

Explanation:
Based on the EBIOS Risk Manager (EBIOS RM) methodology, the attack sequence phases include various steps that an attacker might take to compromise an organization's assets. The four phases generally cover reconnaissance, exploiting vulnerabilities, achieving objectives, and maintaining persistence. "Exploiting" is specifically the phase where the attacker takes advantage of identified vulnerabilities in the system, which directly aligns with option A.


NEW QUESTION # 34
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Based on scenario 2, has Travivve defined the responsibilities of the risk manager appropriately?

  • A. Yes, the risk manager should be responsible for all actions defined bv Traviwe
  • B. No, the risk manager should not be responsible for planning all risk management activities
  • C. No, the risk manager should not be responsible for reporting the monitoring results of the risk management program to the top management

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27005 recommends that the risk manager or a designated authority should oversee the entire risk management process, including planning, monitoring, and reporting. In the scenario, the risk manager is responsible for supervising the team, planning all risk management activities, monitoring the program, and reporting the results to top management. This allocation of responsibilities is aligned with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, which emphasizes that a risk manager should coordinate and manage all aspects of the risk management process to ensure its effectiveness and alignment with the organization's objectives. Therefore, assigning these responsibilities to the risk manager is appropriate, making option A the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 5.3, "Roles and responsibilities," which specifies that those managing risk should have defined roles and should coordinate all activities in the risk management process.


NEW QUESTION # 35
Scenario 2: Travivve is a travel agency that operates in more than 100 countries. Headquartered in San Francisco, the US, the agency is known for its personalized vacation packages and travel services. Travivve aims to deliver reliable services that meet its clients' needs. Considering the impact of information security in its reputation, Travivve decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. In addition, they decided to establish and implement an information security risk management program. Based on the priority of specific departments in Travivve, the top management decided to initially apply the risk management process only in the Sales Management Department. The process would be applicable for other departments only when introducing new technology.
Travivve's top management wanted to make sure that the risk management program is established based on the industry best practices. Therefore, they created a team of three members that would be responsible for establishing and implementing it. One of the team members was Travivve's risk manager who was responsible for supervising the team and planning all risk management activities. In addition, the risk manager was responsible for monitoring the program and reporting the monitoring results to the top management.
Initially, the team decided to analyze the internal and external context of Travivve. As part of the process of understanding the organization and its context, the team identified key processes and activities. Then, the team identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements. In addition, the team identified all the reference documents that applied to the defined scope of the risk management process, which mainly included the Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 and the internal security rules established by Travivve. Lastly, the team analyzed both reference documents and justified a few noncompliances with those requirements.
The risk manager selected the information security risk management method which was aligned with other approaches used by the company to manage other risks. The team also communicated the risk management process to all interested parties through previously established communication mechanisms. In addition, they made sure to inform all interested parties about their roles and responsibilities regarding risk management. Travivve also decided to involve interested parties in its risk management activities since, according to the top management, this process required their active participation.
Lastly, Travivve's risk management team decided to conduct the initial information security risk assessment process. As such, the team established the criteria for performing the information security risk assessment which included the consequence criteria and likelihood criteria.
Did Travivve's risk management team identify the basic requirements of interested parties in accordance with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005? Refer to scenario 2.

  • A. No, the team should define the basic requirements of interested parties, but it should determine status of compliance with the requirements after implementing the risk treatment options
  • B. Yes, the team identified the basic requirements of interested parties and determined the status of compliance with those requirements as recommended by ISO/IEC 27005
  • C. No, the team should use only the organization's internal security rules to determine the status of compliance with the basic requirements of interested parties

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, understanding the organization and its context, including the identification of interested parties and their requirements, is a critical part of the risk management process. The team at Travivve identified the interested parties and their basic requirements and determined the status of compliance with these requirements, which aligns with the guidelines provided by ISO/IEC 27005. This standard recommends that organizations should understand their context and stakeholders' requirements to effectively manage risks. Additionally, it is appropriate to evaluate compliance with requirements as part of the context analysis, rather than after implementing risk treatment options. Therefore, the team's approach was in accordance with ISO/IEC 27005, making option C the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 7, "Context Establishment," which outlines the importance of identifying the context, including the interested parties and their requirements, as a basis for risk management.


NEW QUESTION # 36
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, which risk treatment option did Detika select to treat the risk of a potential ransomware attack?

  • A. Risk avoidance
  • B. Risk retention
  • C. Risk sharing

Answer: B

Explanation:
Risk retention involves accepting the risk when its likelihood or impact is low, or when the cost of mitigating the risk is higher than the benefit. In the scenario, Detika decided to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack because the data is backed up daily, and additional measures were deemed unnecessary. This decision aligns with the risk retention strategy, where an organization chooses to live with the risk rather than apply further controls. Option A is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which discusses risk retention as an option for managing risks deemed acceptable by the organization.


NEW QUESTION # 37
What are opportunities?

  • A. Outcome of an event affecting objectives
  • B. Occurrence or change of a particular set of circumstances
  • C. Combination of circumstances expected to be favorable to objectives

Answer: C

Explanation:
Opportunities, according to ISO standards such as ISO 31000, are situations or conditions that have the potential to provide a favorable impact on achieving objectives. They represent circumstances that, when leveraged, can lead to beneficial outcomes for the organization, such as competitive advantage, growth, or improved performance. Option B is correct as it accurately describes opportunities as circumstances expected to be favorable to achieving objectives. Option A (Occurrence or change of a particular set of circumstances) is a more general definition that could apply to both risks and opportunities, while Option C (Outcome of an event affecting objectives) is more aligned with the concept of risk.


NEW QUESTION # 38
......

Pass PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Quickly With Pass4cram: https://tesking.pass4cram.com/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-dumps-torrent.html